Learn how Prometheus and VictoriaMetrics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Prometheus and VictoriaMetrics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Prometheus significantly outpaces VictoriaMetrics in community adoption with 65,931 stars compared to 17,633 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Prometheus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Prometheus has 10,811 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
VictoriaMetrics is growing faster, adding 187 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 522 stars for Prometheus (+0.8%). VictoriaMetrics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Prometheus last updated 1 day ago and VictoriaMetrics 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Prometheus uses CSS while VictoriaMetrics leverages Perl.
Prometheus has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to VictoriaMetrics which began 8 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Prometheus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Time Series Databases.
Both Prometheus and VictoriaMetrics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.