Learn how Memgraph and OrientDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these graph databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.14.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
memgraph/memgraph
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
3.2.57License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
orientdb
Both Memgraph and OrientDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Memgraph and OrientDB show comparable community engagement with 4,628 and 4,996 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, OrientDB has 869 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Memgraph is growing faster, adding 47 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 7 stars for OrientDB (+0.1%). Memgraph is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Memgraph last updated 2 days ago and OrientDB 3 days ago.
OrientDB has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Memgraph which began 6 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests OrientDB may have more mature features and established processes.
OrientDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Memgraph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Graph Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: Memgraph also focuses on In-Memory Databases while OrientDB extends into NoSQL & Document Databases.
Both Memgraph and OrientDB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.