Learn how FalkorDB and OrientDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these graph databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v6.0.3License
SSPL-1.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
falkordb/falkordb
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
3.2.57License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
orientdb
Both FalkorDB and OrientDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
FalkorDB leads in popularity with 10,493 stars vs 4,996 stars for OrientDB. The 110% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OrientDB has 869 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
FalkorDB is growing faster, adding 4,175 stars in the last 30 days (+66%) against adding 7 stars for OrientDB (+0.1%). FalkorDB is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FalkorDB last updated 7 hours ago and OrientDB 3 days ago.
OrientDB has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to FalkorDB which began 3 years ago. This 10.8-year head start suggests OrientDB may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: FalkorDB is licensed under SSPL-1.0 while OrientDB uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Graph Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: FalkorDB also focuses on Vector Databases while OrientDB extends into NoSQL & Document Databases.
Both FalkorDB and OrientDB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.