Learn how LinkStack and LittleLink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v3.11.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
littlelink
Both LinkStack and LittleLink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with LinkStack having 3,914 stars and LittleLink having 3,104 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, LittleLink has 1,551 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LinkStack is growing faster, adding 33 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 18 stars for LittleLink (+0.6%). LinkStack is both larger and pulling further ahead.
LinkStack shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 hours ago, while LittleLink was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests LinkStack is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LinkStack uses JavaScript, SCSS, PHP, Laravel.
LittleLink has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to LinkStack which began 5 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests LittleLink may have more mature features and established processes.
LittleLink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than LinkStack's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Both LinkStack and LittleLink offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.