Learn how LinkStack and Linky differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

LinkStack appears to have several advantages over Linky, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LinkStack significantly outpaces Linky in community adoption with 3,818 stars compared to 796 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests LinkStack has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LinkStack has 430 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
LinkStack is growing faster, adding 104 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 1 stars for Linky (+0.1%). LinkStack is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LinkStack last updated 1 month ago and Linky 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LinkStack uses PHP, Laravel while Linky leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
LinkStack has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Linky which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests LinkStack may have more mature features and established processes.
Linky uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than LinkStack's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: Linky extends into Website Builders.
Both LinkStack and Linky offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.