Learn how Inbox Zero and Macro Mail differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai personal assistants is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.1.22License
AGPL-3.0Repository
elie222/inbox-zero
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.11.2.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both Inbox Zero and Macro Mail have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Inbox Zero leads in popularity with 12,895 stars vs 6,083 stars for Macro Mail. The 112% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Inbox Zero has 1,653 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro Mail is growing faster, adding 1,543 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 493 stars for Inbox Zero (+4%). Macro Mail is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Inbox Zero last updated 9 hours ago and Macro Mail 9 hours ago.
Inbox Zero has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro Mail which began 1 year ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Inbox Zero may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Personal Assistants, Email Clients.