Learn how Gladys Assistant and Home Assistant differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these smart home automation is best for you.

Home Assistant appears to have several advantages over Gladys Assistant, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Home Assistant significantly outpaces Gladys Assistant in community adoption with 89,918 stars compared to 3,102 stars on GitHub. This 29.0x difference suggests Home Assistant has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Home Assistant has 38,348 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Home Assistant is growing faster, adding 518 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 3 stars for Gladys Assistant (+0.1%). Home Assistant is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gladys Assistant last updated 5 hours ago and Home Assistant 4 hours ago.
Home Assistant has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Gladys Assistant which began 11 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Home Assistant may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Smart Home Automation.
Gladys Assistant provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Home Assistant may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository