Learn how Flipt and Go Feature Flag differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feature flag tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v2.14.1License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
flipt-io/flipt
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.57.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
go-feature-flag
Both Flipt and Go Feature Flag have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Flipt leads in popularity with 4,929 stars vs 2,125 stars for Go Feature Flag. The 132% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Flipt has 316 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Flipt and Go Feature Flag are moving at much the same rate, adding 18 stars and adding 7 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flipt last updated 2 days ago and Go Feature Flag 13 hours ago.
Flipt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Go Feature Flag which began 6 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Flipt may have more mature features and established processes.
Go Feature Flag uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Flipt's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feature Flags.
Both Flipt and Go Feature Flag offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.