Learn how Flipt and Go Feature Flag differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feature flag tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v2.14.1License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
flipt-io/flipt
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.58.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
go-feature-flag
Both Flipt and Go Feature Flag have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Flipt leads in popularity with 4,949 stars vs 2,144 stars for Go Feature Flag. The 131% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Flipt has 321 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Go Feature Flag is growing faster, adding 22 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 31 stars for Flipt (+0.6%). Go Feature Flag is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flipt last updated 1 day ago and Go Feature Flag 5 hours ago.
Flipt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Go Feature Flag which began 6 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Flipt may have more mature features and established processes.
Go Feature Flag uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Flipt's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feature Flags.
Both Flipt and Go Feature Flag offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.