Learn how Cosmos Server and Olares differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these home server platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.23.4Self-hosted
YesRepository
cosmos-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
1.12.7License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
beclab/olares
Both Cosmos Server and Olares have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cosmos Server having 6,185 stars and Olares having 5,320 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Olares has 333 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Olares is growing faster, adding 33 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 19 stars for Cosmos Server (+0.3%). Olares is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cosmos Server last updated 5 days ago and Olares 6 hours ago.
Cosmos Server has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Olares which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Cosmos Server may have more mature features and established processes.
Olares is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Home Server Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cosmos Server also focuses on Control Panels.
Both Cosmos Server and Olares offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.