Learn how Chevereto and Lychee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these image hosting platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
4.5.7License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
chevereto/chevereto
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v7.12.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
lycheeorg/lychee
Lychee appears to have several advantages over Chevereto, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Lychee significantly outpaces Chevereto in community adoption with 4,314 stars compared to 1,002 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests Lychee has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Lychee has 383 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Chevereto and Lychee are moving at much the same rate, adding 4 stars and adding 9 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Chevereto last updated 2 days ago and Lychee 2 days ago.
Lychee has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Chevereto which began 4 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Lychee may have more mature features and established processes.
Lychee uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Chevereto's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Image Hosting. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lychee extends into Photo & Video Management.
Both Chevereto and Lychee offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.