Learn how aaPanel and Laranode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
7.65.0Repository
aapanel/aapanel
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
crivion/laranode
Both aaPanel and Laranode have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
aaPanel significantly outpaces Laranode in community adoption with 3,074 stars compared to 753 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests aaPanel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, aaPanel has 763 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
aaPanel is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against losing 741 stars for Laranode (-50%). aaPanel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with aaPanel last updated 13 days ago and Laranode 1 month ago.
aaPanel has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Laranode which began 2 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests aaPanel may have more mature features and established processes.
Laranode is licensed under MIT, while aaPanel's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Laranode provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while aaPanel may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.