Learn how Laranode and OpenPanel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
crivion/laranode
Last 30 days

OpenPanel appears to have several advantages over Laranode, particularly in growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Laranode and OpenPanel show comparable community engagement with 753 and 765 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPanel has 113 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPanel is growing faster, adding 16 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against losing 741 stars for Laranode (-50%). OpenPanel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
OpenPanel shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Laranode was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests OpenPanel is being more actively maintained.
OpenPanel has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Laranode which began 2 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests OpenPanel may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Both Laranode and OpenPanel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.