Learn how Laranode and OpenPanel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.2.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
crivion/laranode
Last 30 days

OpenPanel appears to have several advantages over Laranode, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Laranode and OpenPanel show comparable community engagement with 748 and 776 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPanel has 117 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPanel is growing faster, adding 16 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against losing 762 stars for Laranode (-50%). OpenPanel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Laranode last updated 20 days ago and OpenPanel 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, JSX, Python, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Laranode uses Laravel while OpenPanel leverages Bash, Typescript, Next.js, Remix.
OpenPanel has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Laranode which began 2 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests OpenPanel may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Both Laranode and OpenPanel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.