Learn how 2FAS and Aegis Authenticator differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password & secret management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
6.1.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
twofas/2fas-android
Last 30 days

Both 2FAS and Aegis Authenticator have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Aegis Authenticator significantly outpaces 2FAS in community adoption with 13,394 stars compared to 1,546 stars on GitHub. This 8.7x difference suggests Aegis Authenticator has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Aegis Authenticator has 610 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
2FAS and Aegis Authenticator are moving at much the same rate, adding 24 stars and adding 233 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.6% vs +1.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
2FAS shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Aegis Authenticator was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests 2FAS is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: 2FAS uses Kotlin while Aegis Authenticator leverages Python.
Aegis Authenticator has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to 2FAS which began 4 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Aegis Authenticator may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Password & Secret Management.