Ad
Learn more

2FAS vs Aegis Authenticator

Learn how 2FAS and Aegis Authenticator differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these password & secret management tools is best for you.

vs

2FAS

Open-source authenticator and password manager that stores 2FA tokens and passwords locally on your device, with zero-knowledge encryption and no account required.
1,546stars+24(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of 2FAS

Aegis Authenticator

Android app for managing two-factor authentication tokens with encrypted storage, biometric unlock, flexible backups, and import/export from major 2FA apps.
13,394stars+233(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    2 months ago
  • Repository age

    10 years
  • Version

    v3.4.3
  • License

    GPL-3.0
  • Repository

    aegis
Screenshot of Aegis Authenticator

Detailed Comparison

Both 2FAS and Aegis Authenticator have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Aegis Authenticator wins
Community & Popularity

Aegis Authenticator significantly outpaces 2FAS in community adoption with 13,394 stars compared to 1,546 stars on GitHub. This 8.7x difference suggests Aegis Authenticator has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Aegis Authenticator has 610 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Growth Momentum

2FAS and Aegis Authenticator are moving at much the same rate, adding 24 stars and adding 233 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.6% vs +1.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

2FAS wins
Development Activity

2FAS shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Aegis Authenticator was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests 2FAS is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: 2FAS uses Kotlin while Aegis Authenticator leverages Python.

Aegis Authenticator wins
Project Maturity

Aegis Authenticator has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to 2FAS which began 4 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Aegis Authenticator may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Password & Secret Management.