Learn how Warpgate and Werbot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ssh access management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.30.4License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
warp-tech/warpgate
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.0.3License
BUSL-1.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
werbot/werbot
Warpgate appears to have several advantages over Werbot, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Warpgate significantly outpaces Werbot in community adoption with 8,265 stars compared to 171 stars on GitHub. This 48.3x difference suggests Warpgate has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Warpgate has 450 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Warpgate is growing faster, adding 179 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 2 stars for Werbot (+1.2%). Warpgate is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Warpgate last updated 1 day ago and Werbot 6 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Warpgate beginning 5 years ago and Werbot 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Warpgate is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Werbot uses BUSL-1.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in SSH Access Management.
Both Warpgate and Werbot offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.