Learn how Warpgate and Werbot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ssh access management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.30.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
warp-tech/warpgate
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.0.3License
BUSL-1.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
werbot/werbot
Warpgate appears to have several advantages over Werbot, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Warpgate significantly outpaces Werbot in community adoption with 8,140 stars compared to 169 stars on GitHub. This 48.2x difference suggests Warpgate has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Warpgate has 432 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Warpgate is growing faster, adding 163 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against losing 1 stars for Werbot (-0.6%). Warpgate is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Warpgate shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Werbot was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Warpgate is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Warpgate beginning 5 years ago and Werbot 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Warpgate is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Werbot uses BUSL-1.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in SSH Access Management.
Both Warpgate and Werbot offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.