Learn how Frappe Builder and Widgetizer differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these website builders is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.39.0License
MITRepository
frappe/builder
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.9.10License
GPL-3.0Repository
tsiger/widgetizer
Frappe Builder appears to have several advantages over Widgetizer, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Frappe Builder significantly outpaces Widgetizer in community adoption with 2,494 stars compared to 164 stars on GitHub. This 15.2x difference suggests Frappe Builder has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe Builder has 581 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Frappe Builder is growing faster, adding 57 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 2 stars for Widgetizer (+1.2%). Frappe Builder is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Builder last updated 13 hours ago and Widgetizer 4 hours ago.
Frappe Builder has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Widgetizer which began 2 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Frappe Builder may have more mature features and established processes.
Frappe Builder uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Widgetizer's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Website Builders. However, they also have distinct specializations: Frappe Builder also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code.