Plakar vs Portabase
Learn how Plakar and Portabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these server backup solutions is best for you.
Learn how Plakar and Portabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these server backup solutions is best for you.
Plakar
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.1.8License
ISCRepository
plakarkorp/plakar
Portabase
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
1.34.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
portabase/portabase
Detailed Comparison
Both Plakar and Portabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Plakar and Portabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Plakar having 2,095 stars and Portabase having 1,855 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Portabase has 140 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Portabase is growing faster, adding 80 stars in the last 30 days (+4.5%) against adding 23 stars for Plakar (+1.1%). Portabase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Plakar last updated 1 day ago and Portabase 1 day ago.
Project Maturity
Plakar has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Portabase which began 2 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Plakar may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Plakar is licensed under ISC while Portabase uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Server Backup.
Hosting & Deployment
Portabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plakar may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.