Learn how Omnara and Paperclip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.2.23License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
omnara-ai/omnara
Last 30 days

Both Omnara and Paperclip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Paperclip significantly outpaces Omnara in community adoption with 114,111 stars compared to 3,400 stars on GitHub. This 33.6x difference suggests Paperclip has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Paperclip has 18,924 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Omnara is growing faster, adding 473 stars in the last 30 days (+16%) against adding 10,999 stars for Paperclip (+11%). Omnara is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Omnara last updated 1 day ago and Paperclip 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang, C.
Both projects started around the same time, with Omnara beginning 1 year ago and Paperclip 9 months ago.
Paperclip uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Omnara's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Paperclip extends into AI Coding Agent Orchestrators.
Both Omnara and Paperclip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.