Learn how Mixpost and TryPost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these social media management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Mixpost and TryPost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mixpost significantly outpaces TryPost in community adoption with 3,535 stars compared to 542 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Mixpost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mixpost has 528 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
TryPost is growing faster, adding 108 stars in the last 30 days (+25%) against adding 79 stars for Mixpost (+2.3%). TryPost is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
TryPost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Mixpost was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests TryPost is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TryPost leverages Bash, Typescript, Laravel.
Mixpost has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to TryPost which began 7 months ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Mixpost may have more mature features and established processes.
Mixpost uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TryPost's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Social Media Management.
Both Mixpost and TryPost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.