Learn how imgproxy and Openinary differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these image optimization & cdn tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both imgproxy and Openinary have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
imgproxy significantly outpaces Openinary in community adoption with 11,030 stars compared to 383 stars on GitHub. This 28.8x difference suggests imgproxy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, imgproxy has 771 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Openinary is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 26 stars for imgproxy (+0.2%). Openinary is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with imgproxy last updated 2 days ago and Openinary 8 days ago.
imgproxy has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Openinary which began 1 year ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests imgproxy may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: imgproxy is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Openinary uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Image Optimization & CDN.
Both imgproxy and Openinary offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.