Ad
Learn more

imgproxy vs Openinary

Learn how imgproxy and Openinary differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these image optimization & cdn tools is best for you.

vs

imgproxy

Self-hosted image processing server that resizes, converts, and optimizes images on demand via URL parameters, with built-in security against common attack vectors.
11,149stars+51(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of imgproxy

Openinary

Upload, transform, and deliver images and videos via a REST API and URL parameters, using your own S3-compatible storage. Cloudinary-compatible syntax, no vendor lock-in.
416stars+11(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Openinary

Detailed Comparison

Both imgproxy and Openinary have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

imgproxy wins
Community & Popularity

imgproxy significantly outpaces Openinary in community adoption with 11,149 stars compared to 416 stars on GitHub. This 26.8x difference suggests imgproxy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, imgproxy has 781 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Openinary wins
Growth Momentum

Openinary is growing faster, adding 11 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 51 stars for imgproxy (+0.5%). Openinary is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with imgproxy last updated 4 days ago and Openinary 22 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: imgproxy uses Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, Swift, Ruby, C#, Elixir, Dart, Clojure while Openinary leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

imgproxy wins
Project Maturity

imgproxy has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Openinary which began 1 year ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests imgproxy may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

The projects use different licenses: imgproxy is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Openinary uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Image Optimization & CDN.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both imgproxy and Openinary offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.