Learn how Hi.Events and Revel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these event ticketing & management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.36.3License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
revel-backend
Both Hi.Events and Revel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hi.Events significantly outpaces Revel in community adoption with 4,180 stars compared to 118 stars on GitHub. This 35.4x difference suggests Hi.Events has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hi.Events has 756 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Revel is growing faster, adding 7 stars in the last 30 days (+6.3%) against adding 111 stars for Hi.Events (+2.7%). Revel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hi.Events last updated 6 days ago and Revel 8 hours ago.
Hi.Events has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Revel which began 1 year ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Hi.Events may have more mature features and established processes.
Revel is licensed under MIT, while Hi.Events's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Event Ticketing & Management.
Both Hi.Events and Revel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.