Learn how BlinkDisk and Pluton differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these desktop backup tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.11.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
blinkdisk/blinkdisk
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
11 monthsVersion
v0.21.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
plutonhq/pluton
Pluton appears to have several advantages over BlinkDisk, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pluton significantly outpaces BlinkDisk in community adoption with 866 stars compared to 191 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Pluton has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pluton has 36 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Pluton is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 4 stars for BlinkDisk (+2.1%). Pluton is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with BlinkDisk last updated 2 days ago and Pluton 6 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with BlinkDisk beginning 1 year ago and Pluton 11 months ago.
The projects use different licenses: BlinkDisk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Pluton uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Desktop Backup. However, they also have distinct specializations: Pluton extends into Server Backup.
Pluton provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while BlinkDisk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.