Learn how bisibility and OpenSEO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these seo tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
4 monthsVersion
v0.43.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bisibility
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v0.1.17License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
every-app/open-seo
Both bisibility and OpenSEO have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenSEO significantly outpaces bisibility in community adoption with 25,001 stars compared to 590 stars on GitHub. This 42.4x difference suggests OpenSEO has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSEO has 3,410 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
bisibility is growing faster, adding 378 stars in the last 30 days (+178%) against adding 3,784 stars for OpenSEO (+18%). bisibility is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with bisibility last updated 13 hours ago and OpenSEO 8 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with bisibility beginning 4 months ago and OpenSEO 8 months ago.
OpenSEO uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than bisibility's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in SEO Tools.
Both bisibility and OpenSEO offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.