Learn how Sendportal and Sendune differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Sendportal appears to have several advantages over Sendune, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Sendportal and Sendune show comparable community engagement with 2,176 and 2,307 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 466 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sendportal is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 3 stars for Sendune (+0.1%). Sendportal is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Sendune shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 months ago, while Sendportal was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Sendune is being more actively maintained.
Sendportal uses PHP, Laravel while Sendune leverages CSS, Typescript, SCSS.
Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Sendune which began 3 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sendportal also focuses on Email Platforms while Sendune extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
Sendportal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Sendune may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.